News: Registration requires "verification" before you are allowed to post.  Be sure to check your "spam" folder to make sure that you receive the verification link.  The e-mail should come from "Onnidan Fan Forum" with the return address -> staff@onnidan.com.

Author Topic: Clarence & Ginnie Thomas did not disclose income  (Read 1896 times)

Offline Bison66

  • Assistant GM
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,122
  • Karma: +109/-36
  • Adinkra Symbol for "Unbreakable" "Resilient"
    • View Profile
    • CLANDESTINE - The Book
Re: Clarence & Ginnie Thomas did not disclose income
« Reply #15 on: January 25, 2011, 12:31:14 PM »
Steven Lubet, an expert on judicial ethics at Northwestern University School of Law, said that such an infraction was unlikely to result in a penalty. While unfamiliar with the Thomas complaint, he said that failure to disclose spousal income "is not a crime of any sort, but there is a potential civil penalty" for failing to follow the rules. He added: "I am not aware of a single case of a judge being penalized simply for this."

The Supreme Court is, "the only judicial body in the country that is not governed by a set of judicial ethical rules," Gillers said.

Quote
Lubet might want to try telling that to Rachelle Thomas-Zuill, a former FBI employee in San Francisco, who pleaded guilty earlier this month to making false statements to a government agency, which is a felony.

Lubet also might want to familiarize himself with 18 U.S. Code 1001, the statute under which Thomas-Zuill was prosecuted. The law makes it a crime to knowingly and willfully make "any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation" in any matter "within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States."
http://open.salon.com/blog/rogershuler/2011/01/24/has_clarence_thomas_committed_a_crime/comment

O0


Offline Ken

  • Assistant GM
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,239
  • Karma: +118/-12
    • View Profile
Re: Clarence & Ginnie Thomas did not disclose income
« Reply #16 on: January 25, 2011, 12:49:42 PM »
So as usual OS did not tell the WHOLE story.  Sort of like NAZI Propaganda, he only gives bits and pieces of an article that will make him look good.

Offline Ken

  • Assistant GM
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,239
  • Karma: +118/-12
    • View Profile
Re: Clarence & Ginnie Thomas did not disclose income
« Reply #17 on: January 25, 2011, 12:50:39 PM »
We know Thomas is not of the judicial branch so he is exempt.

Offline Wildman78

  • Assistant GM
  • *****
  • Posts: 14,306
  • Karma: +5/-8
    • View Profile
    • http://N/A
Re: Clarence & Ginnie Thomas did not disclose income
« Reply #18 on: January 25, 2011, 01:29:57 PM »
Steven Lubet, an expert on judicial ethics at Northwestern University School of Law, said that such an infraction was unlikely to result in a penalty. While unfamiliar with the Thomas complaint, he said that failure to disclose spousal income "is not a crime of any sort, but there is a potential civil penalty" for failing to follow the rules. He added: "I am not aware of a single case of a judge being penalized simply for this."

The Supreme Court is, "the only judicial body in the country that is not governed by a set of judicial ethical rules," Gillers said.

Quote
Lubet might want to try telling that to Rachelle Thomas-Zuill, a former FBI employee in San Francisco, who pleaded guilty earlier this month to making false statements to a government agency, which is a felony.

Lubet also might want to familiarize himself with 18 U.S. Code 1001, the statute under which Thomas-Zuill was prosecuted. The law makes it a crime to knowingly and willfully make "any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation" in any matter "within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States."
http://open.salon.com/blog/rogershuler/2011/01/24/has_clarence_thomas_committed_a_crime/comment

O0



Nah. Nothing is going to come of this.

ยง 104. Failure to file or filing false reports

(a) The Attorney General may bring a civil action in any appropriate United States district court against any individual who knowingly and willfully falsifies or who knowingly and willfully fails to file or report any information that such individual is required to report pursuant to section 102. The court in which such action is brought may assess against such individual a civil penalty in any amount, not to exceed $10,000.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode05a/usc_sec_05a_00000104----000-.html

Offline Bison66

  • Assistant GM
  • *****
  • Posts: 23,122
  • Karma: +109/-36
  • Adinkra Symbol for "Unbreakable" "Resilient"
    • View Profile
    • CLANDESTINE - The Book
Re: Clarence & Ginnie Thomas did not disclose income
« Reply #19 on: January 25, 2011, 04:47:25 PM »
Wildman,

I agree.
Nothing will come of it.
But...that don't make it right.

O0

Offline soflorattler

  • Assistant GM
  • *****
  • Posts: 34,676
  • Karma: +242/-158
    • View Profile
    • The Snake Pit
Re: Clarence & Ginnie Thomas did not disclose income
« Reply #20 on: January 25, 2011, 05:40:13 PM »
According to Judge Pigmeat markham.....


 :lmao: :lmao:

Man! What you know about Pigmeat Markham... :lol: :lol: :lol:
If capitalism is so great, why does it need to be bailed out by socialism every ten years?


Online EB

  • Assistant GM
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,835
  • Karma: +116/-5
  • Veteran
    • View Profile
Re: Clarence & Ginnie Thomas did not disclose income
« Reply #21 on: January 25, 2011, 08:48:25 PM »


----------

I should state that I have met more than a few people from the Savannah, Georgia area, where Justice Thomas' hometown is near, and find them to be very intelligent.

 

Onnidan's HBCUSports Logo
News

 

Support Onnidan

Support the Fan Forum

With all the divisive rhetoric on social media outlets, websites such as ours, especially message boards, are under the watchful eye of the Internet giants. And those giants are coming down hard on sites like this one due to the perception of the need for better "oversight".

We recognize the cultural conflict that exists and over the past few months we've been accused of allowing content in posts/threads that supposedly violates some advertiser's policies. Those threads weren’t an issue in the past, but for some reason, they are an issue now. And we are being penalized (financially) because of it.

As a result we are coming to you directly for your financial support.

The pandemic has financial consequences, especially for Black-owned businesses. Ad revenue is shrinking so we are asking you directly for your financial support. You can use the Cash App and contribute to $onnidan or process your donation through Square

 

 

Powered by EzPortal