News: In case some of you have forgotten, please go back and read the agreement you signed before registering on this board.   Continuous attacks on an individual, including revealing who you think a person is or sending Private Messages with threats and attacks, are grounds for removal from the registration listing.  If you can't be civil, go someplace else. Don't discredit your education by showing your "thug" personality.

Author Topic: The moral pitfalls of weighing Trump’s actions one at a time  (Read 151 times)

Offline Wildman78

  • Assistant GM
  • *****
  • Posts: 16,567
  • Karma: +22/-78
    • View Profile
    • http://N/A
The pitfalls of weighing Trump’s actions one at a time and hoping thereby to arrive at a judicious assessment.

In recent months, a consensus has emerged among the conservative dissidents of the Trump era: We’ll continue to oppose the president when his policies and practices are counter to our principles, they say, but also be sure to publicly give credit whenever he stakes out an agreeable position on any issue that matters. During the campaign, obdurate opposition served the purpose of challenging his candidacy and elevating his competitors, but now, with Trump sitting in the Oval Office, the thinking goes, it smacks of sour grapes—and, given that he does do things with which we agree, it amounts to cutting off our noses to spite our faces. So, serve as the loyal opposition as necessary but join the cause when possible.


It is a coherent approach. It is the pragmatic one. But it is unsatisfying and unsettling. And with each casual lie, crude insult, attack on the media, slight of the intelligence community, and example of grotesque servility to Russia’s dictator, it increasingly appears morally misguided.

The first problem with itemizing and compartmentalizing is that actions can’t be treated as discrete. In politics, they are the direct result of a system’s arrangements and a leader’s philosophy. They reflect the larger enterprise. We deceive ourselves by separating quiet streets from the oppressive police state that brought them about. We shouldn’t laud an initiative to aid the impoverished if it’s part of a Rawlsian undertaking that continuously impinges on liberty. Support for modernizing an outdated social convention is irresponsible if the larger agenda aims to replace all traditions with state-controlled institutions. In other words, we have to be mindful of a position’s pedigree and its role in a broader program. If President Trump has a modus operandi, it is the control, manipulation, and distortion of information: hiding his tax returns, meeting with Putin alone, firing the FBI director investigating him, lying habitually, undermining the media, pitting staff against each other. We are being purposely obtuse if we don’t assess his executive actions in this context. Our constant need to cordon off specific Trump actions from others is a red flag waving in the wind.

https://www.weeklystandard.com/andy-smarick/the-moral-ledger

Offline CU1994

  • Assistant GM
  • *****
  • Posts: 21,084
  • Karma: +132/-265
    • View Profile
    • www.cheyney.edu
Re: The moral pitfalls of weighing Trump’s actions one at a time
« Reply #1 on: July 24, 2018, 09:38:36 AM »
This is a good article. The problem with lowering the bar so much for Trump is the entire country loses all credibility related to truth and decency. We know politicians bend the truth but Trump has set a new low for truthfulness. How do you tell kids to be honest or not to bully? How do you tell boys to treat women with respect or have integrity in business when they can reply the President has no integrity and millions of Americans blindly follow him.

Donald J. Trump is a morally reprehensible person and we have a United States Congress that is failing to hold him accountable.

Offline Strike79

  • Assistant GM
  • *****
  • Posts: 17,136
  • Karma: +173/-206
    • View Profile
Re: The moral pitfalls of weighing Trump’s actions one at a time
« Reply #2 on: July 24, 2018, 10:16:31 AM »
 :nod:^^^^and, CU, by Congress failing to hold dude “accountable” for his excesses, they are ALSO violating their constitutional oaths. They ALL swore to “defend” the Constitution upon taking their seats in Congress.

So if they are going to WILLINGLY allow the Executive to turn the Oval Office into a moral cesspool, then, this whole system undergirding the constitutional republic will fall under its own weight.

Don’t wish to sound unduly alarmist, but my view is that, while we don’t know yet how the Trump presidency will culminate, the damage to the system has already been done.

And that damage is irreparable.

God Bless America.  :(


Offline Bison66

  • Assistant GM
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,526
  • Karma: +119/-77
  • What I discovered about my Ancestor was AMAZING!
    • View Profile
    • CLANDESTINE - The Book
Re: The moral pitfalls of weighing Trump’s actions one at a time
« Reply #3 on: July 24, 2018, 12:21:40 PM »
^^TWO^^ EXCELLENT INSIGHTFUL AND RATHER RESTRAINED COMMENTS BY TWO OF OUR MOST INCISIVE POSTERS!

THANKS y'all!

Wildman, I appreciate you sharing that piece from The Standard.

O0

 

 

2019 Onnidan HBCU Composite Football Schedule

 

Powered by EzPortal