...........guys, I just thought about something.
Lets assume that Mr. Miller is motivated by a desire to preserve what he thinks is some kind of "wholesome image" or something. If ALL that is depicted on that tape is him having sexual intercourse with this gal, why would she be demanding $2.5M from him not to publish the tape. And, rejecting her demand, why would he be desperate enough to stop from releasing it by filing a lawsuit enjoining her from doling so?
Unless he was, say, married with children, and didn't want to go through the mental and financial stress of a nasty divorce, what single, viral, wealthy young man like Von Miller would give a rat's a.z.z about the publication of a videotape depicting him having "normal" sexual intercourse with a woman?
I'm thinking that the tape likely depicts Mr. Miller engaging in some kind of sexual practice that others may find distasteful and/or even grotesque. I remember how naive I was when it was first reported a few years back that R. Kelly was depicted on his "sex tapes" with under-aged girls giving them a "golden shower". I believe it was peeps on this board who had to assist me in understanding what is a "golden shower".
