c-f, wants the president to call out conservative talk radio and fox news and blame them for the shooting. the truth is the alleged shooter has been described as being a liberal by his friends. he is a registered independent. there is no evidence that the alleged shooter was influenced in any way by any conservative. yet, he wants the president of the united states to jump the gun. how foolish.
I DO NOT NEED OR REQUIRE YOU TO SPEAK FOR ME OR TRY AND INTERPRET MY POSTS. PLEASE FEEL FREE TO RESPOND TO ANY AND EVERTHING I POST. EVERYTHING YOU POST ABOVE ARE YOUR WORDS. BE A MAN AND TAKE CREDIT FOR YOUR OWN WORDS. I SAY WHAT I MEAN AND MEAN PRECISELY WHAT I SAY.
AGAIN, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO RESPOND BUT I THINK MY WORDS ARE SUFFICIENTLY CLEAR AND NEED NO ADENDUMS FROM YOU.
well I need clarification. Still don't see your example of a "strong response."
I FIND YOU AT TIMES SO VERY AMUSING. YOU NEED CLARIFICATION? WELL LET ME MAKE IT PLAIN FOR YOU. THE PRESIDENT NEEDS TO IN NO UNCERTAIN TERMS STATE THAT THE GLEN BECKS, HANNITYS, AND LIMBAUGHS OF THE WORLD WHILE WITHIN THEIR RIGHT TO EXPOUSE THEIR VENEMOUS RHETORIC ALSO NEED TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR INCENDIARY POLITICAL RHETORIC THAT INSPIRES WEAK-MINDS TO COMMIT ACTS OF POLITICAL TERROR IN THE NAME OF THE GOP. THE FOX NEWS NETWORK SHOULD CLEARLY AND WITHOUT ANY EQUIVOCATION DEFINE WHEN THEY ARE OBJECTIVELY REPORTING THE NEWS AND WHEN THEY ARE SPOUTING PARTISAN POLITICAL OPINION EDITORIALS. THOSE THAT EXPOUSE "SECOND AMENDMENT" SOLUTIONS SHOULD BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE WHEN SOME MENTALLY DERANGED INDIVIDUAL USES FIREARMS TO RESOLVE A POLITCAL DEBATE. THAT CIVILITY RETURNS TO THE BODY POLITIC AND THAT REGARDLESS OF HOW ONE FEELS ABOUT THE INDIVIDUAL, THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT BE RESPECTED AND THE HOLDER OF THE OFFICE NOT HAVE TO BE CALLED A LIAR IN PUBLIC BY AN ELECTED PUBLIC OFFICIAL. THAT POLITICIANS USE OF POLITCAL IMAGERY I.E. A GUN SIGHT OR BULLS EYE TO TARGET POLITICAL ENEMIES BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR SUCH TACTICS. I WONDER IF SARAH PALIN WAS REALLY USING A SURVEYORS LENS ON HER POLITCAL HIT LIST WEBSITE AND NOT A CROSSHAIR, WHY SHE WOULD FEEL COMPELLED TO TAKE THE SIGHT DOWN SO SUDDENLY?
THESE ARE BUT A FEW THINGS THAT COME TO MY MIND THAT I BELIEVE THE PRESIDENT SHOULD ADDRESS DIRECTLY AND FORCEFULLY.IS THIS A STRONG ENOUGH PROPOSED RESPONSE FOR YOU?