This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - iceman4221
1
« on: July 15, 2019, 09:50:41 PM »
This was predictable and foreseeable, the trucking industry has been playing a game for sometime now, with owner/operators...
RIGGED: Forced into debt. Worked past exhaustion. Left with nothing. Click link to see Investigation by USA Today Journalist
Capitalism at its best is built upon labor exploitation, learn the game and stay ahead of the CON...
2
« on: July 14, 2019, 08:14:57 AM »
Huawei Plans Extensive Layoffs in the U.S.By Dan Strumpf Updated July 13, 2019 10:27 pm ET Huawei Technologies Co. is planning extensive layoffs at its U.S. operations, according to people familiar with the matter, as the Chinese technology giant continues to struggle with its American blacklisting. The layoffs are expected to affect workers at Huawei’s U.S.-based research and development subsidiary, Futurewei Technologies, according to these people. The unit employs about 850 people in research labs across the U.S., including in Texas, California and Washington state. Huawei declined to comment. The exact number of layoffs couldn't be determined, but one of the people said they were expected to be in the hundreds. Some of Huawei’s Chinese employees in the U.S. were being given the option of returning home and staying with the company, another person said. Futurewei employees have faced restrictions communicating with colleagues in Huawei’s home offices in China following the May 16 Commerce Department decision to put Huawei on its so-called entity list, which blocked companies from supplying U.S.-sourced technology to Huawei without a license, according to these people. Several employees have already been notified of their dismissal, while additional planned cuts could be announced soon, these people said. The blacklisting has limited Huawei’s ability to buy critical U.S. components and software for its products, which include its smartphones and cellular base stations that are popular outside the U.S. Huawei bought $11 billion worth of American technology last year. A reprieve for Huawei appeared to be in sight after President Trump said at the Group of 20 summit at Osaka, Japan, last month that he would allow some tech exports to the company to resume. Beijing sees an easing of restrictions on Huawei as a precondition for any trade deal with Washington. Click the link at the top for the rest of the story
4
« on: July 12, 2019, 05:23:37 PM »
But...but...you said that...
Acosta is not going anywhere except back to his position as Secretary of Labor.
We Already Know, That Was "The Original"...
5
« on: July 12, 2019, 05:11:48 PM »
The Epstein plea deal was in 07-08 , BEFORE Obama lol. He was appointed by BUSH. He left the US attorney office in July 2009. Obama was installed on 1/20/09. Nice try tho
So true, but Barry and his AG had a opportunity to review this matter.
Listen Old Sport you can't clean this she-it up, maintain your peace and accept the fact that you were wrong on this one. Each attempt to do otherwise, makes you look more and more like a "moronic asswipe".
6
« on: July 12, 2019, 04:31:23 PM »
Agent orange is the swamp.
Olds and Y continue support pedophiles because their god agent orange supports it - first roy moore, not this. 
. U are Tellin The Truth!!!
7
« on: July 11, 2019, 09:46:22 PM »
Politics As Usual...
Read My Tag Line Down Below...
This Has Nothing To Do With A Political Party, This Has To Do With "Right And Wrong"...
How Would You Feel If The Victim Was Your Child??? Now We Go To School!!!
At The End Of The Day Acosta Made An Unrighteous Plea Deal - Period, Point Blank!!!
Stop Supporting People and Giving Them A Pass When They Do Wrong, Just Because You Identify With A Political Party
8
« on: July 05, 2019, 10:58:29 PM »
Bluedog, it is not just black men, but men PERIOD who will vote for a woman. Even worst is some women will not vote for a woman. There is not way a woman should not be POTUS because if it was a vote along gender lines, a woman will win.
The ironic thing is one of co-worker was talking about this subject last week. He said the Dems should have a woman as the person because those clear boys will not vote for her. I could not disagree with him, but as I stated, before, the women should be her in office.
That's not what i got from his article at all. While he did touch on that. He specifically talked about the 13% of black men who voted for Trump because they wouldn't vote for a woman, and how it correlates to the fact that South Carolina has yet to vote for a black woman Statewide. With the black male vote being the Swing Vote
Reading is fundamental, but comprehension (understanding) is imperative...
10
« on: June 26, 2019, 12:07:46 PM »
"Honesty Over Loyalty to One's Party"
Shepard Smith is a Truth Hawk!!!
12
« on: June 23, 2019, 04:28:02 PM »
I'm not surprised they are lined up with the racist.
Yeah right y04185, Biden so racist that is why he agreed to be Obama's vice-president
Additionally, there were/are many Blacks that opposed/oppose bussing for the purpose of desegregation. In most instances, it was the Black children bore the burden of being bussed from their neighborhoods.
Years after a Kansas City court implemented busing, black students in integratedmagnet schools performed no better than blacks in neighborhood schools. San Franciscospent more than $200 million [on busing] following a 1982 court order to end schoolsegregation, but a 1992 study led by Harvard Professor Gary Orfield, who supports busing,found black and Hispanic students lacked ``even modest overall improvement'' [as a resultof intrusive court-ordered busing.] A National Institute of Education report couldnot even find a single study showing black kids fared appreciably better following aswitch to integrated schools.
"...In fact, it is patronizing to think that minority students need to sit next to a white student in order to learn. Many black leaders, from Wisconsin State Rep. Annette Polly Williams, a Milwaukee Democrat, to Cleveland Mayor Michael White have come to that conclusion and led efforts to end busing.
"...Busing teaches our children a terrible lesson. Rather than eliminating racial discrimination, busing promotes it by teaching children that the government should treatthem differently on the basis of their race." (Charlotte Observer 08/12/99 byMarc Levin and Ed Blum)
http://www.adversity.net/education_2_north_carolina.htm
Finally, I wonder if y04185 would say that Gerald Ford was racist:
Missing the Bus: Gerald Ford and School Desegregation
Like the Boston priest, Representative Gerald Ford had supported the 1954 Brown v Board of Education decision which led to the Little Rock desegregation, but he had opposed the 1971 Swann v Charlotte-Mecklenburg School District verdict which cleared the way for the Boston desegregation. And when President Gerald Ford responded to violent resistance in Boston and elsewhere by speaking equivocally and acting reluctantly, advocates of busing to coerce desegregation accused him of refusing to answer the call of leadership which beckons a powerful individual to steer society on a proper, if unpopular, course.
As a politician, Ford knew that busing was not popular. As a conservative Republican, however, Ford believed that a substantial federal alternative to busing would not be proper. So he haltingly led the country on a search for a more palatable remedy for school segregation. In the years during and since his administration, however, neither he nor the country has ever really found one.
https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-20223418/missing-the-bus-gerald-ford-and-school-desegregation
Thanks for posting this information Wildman78...
14
« on: June 21, 2019, 08:45:41 PM »
How come when Black democrats agree on an issue they in lockstep or engaging in group think, but when Black Republicans all agree on an issue, they are thinking independently. 
[/size] What He Said!!!
|
Show Posts
And those billionaires and millionaires ain't giving back one dime of that tax cut money to bale them out.
