Can the hard right on Onnidan provide real political dialogue?

[Bison 4 Life]

 

[CIAA-FAN]

THEY WON'T REPLY OTHER THAN TO REFER TO OTHERS DIRISIVELY AS "YOU PEOPLE" OR CHOOSE NOT TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES BY HIS NAME AND TITLE. ...OR PUT THEIR LACK OF INTELLIGENCE ON DISPLAY FOR ALL TO SEE BY "CUTTING AND PASTING" SOME LONG DIATRIBE AND ORIGINAL THOUGHTS OF OTHERS; AS OPPOSED TO STRINGING TOGETHER MORE THAN A SENTENCE OF THEIR OWN WORDS.  WHICH LEADS ME TO WONDER HOW THEY EVEN GOT OUT OF ENGLISH 101.

[uchighlander]

THEY WON'T REPLY OTHER THAN TO REFER TO OTHERS DIRISIVELY AS "YOU PEOPLE" OR CHOOSE NOT TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES BY HIS NAME AND TITLE. ...OR PUT THEIR LACK OF INTELLIGENCE ON DISPLAY FOR ALL TO SEE BY "CUTTING AND PASTING" SOME LONG DIATRIBE AND ORIGINAL THOUGHTS OF OTHERS; AS OPPOSED TO STRINGING TOGETHER MORE THAN A SENTENCE OF THEIR OWN WORDS.  WHICH LEADS ME TO WONDER HOW THEY EVEN GOT OUT OF ENGLISH 101.

That's quite a broad brush there CIAA-FAN. Just where do I fit in that mold? I always refer to the president as Obama or the president, I have never cut and pasted anything and maybe once refered to the liberal side of this board as "you people" but I don't remember when. GO VIKINGS!!!

[y04185]

highlander tried that and you people took it down hill fast.  when the name calling starts it is usually started by you people.  you people don't even limit the insults to the political threads.  it is evident you people revel in insulting anything republican.  especially black republicans.

[Bison 4 Life]

highlander tried that and you people took it down hill fast.  when the name calling starts it is usually started by you people.  you people don't even limit the insults to the political threads.  it is evident you people revel in insulting anything republican.  especially black republicans.

Pick an issue and prove it?

[y04185]

here is a non political thread that you people took to the dogs.

http://onnidan1.com/forum/index.php/topic,31400.0.html

[Bison66]

here is a non political thread that you people took to the dogs.

http://onnidan1.com/forum/index.php/topic,31400.0.html

y04,

I don't think that thread proves your case.
The major offender there was Tiger, who I don't recall ever seeing in Politics in the time I've been here.

Before I start compiling my examples, would you concede that "when the name calling starts it is usually started by you people."  usually applies to Oldsport? 

I am not talking about ORIGINAL SIN (highlander or someone has already blamed incivility on liberals during the French Revolution - LOL!!).  I mean, in the here and now, when you start with a thread title calling people "K----s" or disrespecting the President, one cannot expect - always - a calm and gentlemanly response.

So, I am asking, do you concede that point?
 

[oldsport]

here is a non political thread that you people took to the dogs.

http://onnidan1.com/forum/index.php/topic,31400.0.html

y04,

I don't think that thread proves your case.
The major offender there was Tiger, who I don't recall ever seeing in Politics in the time I've been here.

Before I start compiling my examples, would you concede that "when the name calling starts it is usually started by you people."  usually applies to Oldsport?  

I am not talking about ORIGINAL SIN (highlander or someone has already blamed incivility on liberals during the French Revolution - LOL!!).  I mean, in the here and now, when you start with a thread title calling people "K----s" or disrespecting the President, one cannot expect - always - a calm and gentlemanly response.

So, I am asking, do you concede that point?
 

Personally, I don't want a dialogue with these folk. I intend to continue to slam their wrongheadness until it blows up in their faces. At some point during Barry's sorry arse administration these K----s will see the light. I pray that many of them will finally see how their being played by the left.

[uchighlander]

here is a non political thread that you people took to the dogs.

http://onnidan1.com/forum/index.php/topic,31400.0.html

y04,

I don't think that thread proves your case.
The major offender there was Tiger, who I don't recall ever seeing in Politics in the time I've been here.

Before I start compiling my examples, would you concede that "when the name calling starts it is usually started by you people."  usually applies to Oldsport? 

I am not talking about ORIGINAL SIN (highlander or someone has already blamed incivility on liberals during the French Revolution - LOL!!).  I mean, in the here and now, when you start with a thread title calling people "K----s" or disrespecting the President, one cannot expect - always - a calm and gentlemanly response.

So, I am asking, do you concede that point?
 

I know this question wasn't aimed at me but I was named in the thread so I'll give it a shot. What OS does is his business. I have been called every name in the book by the lberals on this board.....I might have called Cholly a clown once but that's about it as far as my name calling. I don't think you can say the same B66. GO VIKNGS!!!

[y04185]

bison, explain this thread:

http://onnidan1.com/forum/index.php/topic,31187.0.html

better yet explain this one:

http://onnidan1.com/forum/index.php/topic,30848.0.html

the problem is you people condone this.

[DaBassman]

here is a non political thread that you people took to the dogs.

http://onnidan1.com/forum/index.php/topic,31400.0.html

Another republican smoke screen.  How does this prove anything related to this thread?  I was insulted but I am not a republican.  That is my main problem with you, Oldsport and now UCH.  Your arguments are always so irrational.

[uchighlander]

Irrational ?  You must be joking. Just because you don't agree doesn't make them irrational. GO VIKINGS!!!

[Maroon and Gray]

Irrational ?  You must be joking. Just because you don't agree doesn't make them irrational. GO VIKINGS!!!

you have to consider the source.

[DaBassman]

Irrational ?  You must be joking. Just because you don't agree doesn't make them irrational. GO VIKINGS!!!

you have to consider the source.

Oh yeah I should have included your a-- as well.

[Maroon and Gray]

Irrational ?  You must be joking. Just because you don't agree doesn't make them irrational. GO VIKINGS!!!

you have to consider the source.

Oh yeah I should have included your a-- as well.

See, was that necessary?

YOU implied irrational on a mere disagreement on the issues.