THE VERBAL SLIP THAT WILL SINK OBAMA'S a--!!!

[Pmist]

Let us conveniently  forget all the misdeeds radical Christians have done throughout humanity. Once upon a time, Christians donned white sheets as they hung your black a-- relatives from  trees.

Hold on Bear, slow your roll. This is my faith you are so casually stepping on. We all know that everyone that claims to be Christian are not, so please do not paint an entire faith by the antics of the few.   The way to find a Christian is by to look at their walk. This is how you can tell a real Christian from one that merely wears the name. Not saying we Christians are perfect, however even in our failings we always try to do what is right by God.

[Capler]

I could care less about Muslims or Christians. All I'm saying is to chill with the my religion is better than his crap. If you're going to expose one man's sins, man up and include your sins too. We are all one and the same and it kills me the way Republicans try to divide and conquer.

[Ken]

The enslavement of Blacks by Muslims were based on conquest not on the basis of skin color unlike our Christian counterparts. Now Iam not a Muslim so someone on this board can correct me, but if you are a slave of a Muslim you must live as he lives, eat what he eats and wear what he wears, unlike  slavery in the US.  Also blacks were not really "free" in America until the 1960's. The Emancipation Proclamation only freed blacks in certain areas of the country. If you were a slave in parts of the south that was occupied by Union soldiers you were still a slave. And if you lived in West Virginia you were still a slave. The Proclamation would have been declared illegal if taken to court and only the "war powers" of Lincoln made it legal. As a matter of fact the Proclamation only freed slaves in area not occupied by the Union Army.

[Capler]

Pmist, the same thing can be said about Muslins too. It just kills me the way some folk on this site pick out the information they want while ignoring the rest.  This has been very apparent during these political discussions. Both sides are radical if you ask me.

[oldsport]

The enslavement of Blacks by Muslims were based on conquest not on the basis of skin color unlike our Christian counterparts. Now Iam not a Muslim so someone on this board can correct me, but if you are a slave of a Muslim you must live as he lives, eat what he eats and wear what he wears, unlike  slavery in the US.  Also blacks were not really "free" in America until the 1960's. The Emancipation Proclamation only freed blacks in certain areas of the country. If you were a slave in parts of the south that was occupied by Union soldiers you were still a slave. And if you lived in West Virginia you were still a slave. The Proclamation would have been declared illegal if taken to court and only the "war powers" of Lincoln made it legal. As a matter of fact the Proclamation only freed slaves in area not occupied by the Union Army.

Are you crazy with this slavery by degree BS? You people are really warped.

[Ken]

There is a slavery by degree.  Some of the black Romans slaves not only were set free but became Emperors.

[Bison 4 Life]

More of humanity died in the name of religion than any other system to include border protection and that's a fact.

oldsport you know some HBCU were founded or sponsered by atheists.

[oldsport]

More of humanity died in the name of religion than any other system to include border protection and that's a fact.

oldsport you know some HBCU were founded or sponsered by atheists.

Namely, Howard.

[SPC Fighting Tiger]

Pmist, the same thing can be said about Muslins too. It just kills me the way some folk on this site pick out the information they want while ignoring the rest.  This has been very apparent during these political discussions. Both sides are radical if you ask me.

Capler, I will say this once again and no more.
THE CRUCIAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CHRISTIANINTY AND ISLAM, LIES NOT WITH THE FOLLOWERS, BUT WITH THE ICONS.
In Mohammed's role as a military commander, he slew, enslaved and taxed thousands of people in converting them to Islam. This is a fact , it is in the Koran, and it is indsputable.
Jesus's actions in the bible (and elsewhere) has always showed him to be a man of peace, and one that let free will decide who would be converted and who wouldn't.
That's why the Crusades, the Klan, slavery, etc, may have been done in the name of Christianity, but CLEARLY not OF Christianity, as defined in teh Bible, and by Jesus's actions.
Now, knowing the the Koran teaches that infidels are to be enslaved, taxed, converted or killed, can you REALLY say that the recent Muslim terrorist attacks are in the same boat as Christians?

[Maroon and Gray]

Pmist, the same thing can be said about Muslins too. It just kills me the way some folk on this site pick out the information they want while ignoring the rest.  This has been very apparent during these political discussions. Both sides are radical if you ask me.

Capler, I will say this once again and no more.
THE CRUCIAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CHRISTIANINTY AND ISLAM, LIES NOT WITH THE FOLLOWERS, BUT WITH THE ICONS.
In Mohammed's role as a military commander, he slew, enslaved and taxed thousands of people in converting them to Islam. This is a fact , it is in the Koran, and it is indsputable.
Jesus's actions in the bible (and elsewhere) has always showed him to be a man of peace, and one that let free will decide who would be converted and who wouldn't.
That's why the Crusades, the Klan, slavery, etc, may have been done in the name of Christianity, but CLEARLY not OF Christianity, as defined in teh Bible, and by Jesus's actions.
Now, knowing the the Koran teaches that infidels are to be enslaved, taxed, converted or killed, can you REALLY say that the recent Muslim terrorist attacks are in the same boat as Christians?

All the more reason to CLOSELY monitor Obama.  That was a helluva Freudian slip.  He didn't even correct himself, Stephanopoulos had to.

[oldsport]

Pmist, the same thing can be said about Muslins too. It just kills me the way some folk on this site pick out the information they want while ignoring the rest.  This has been very apparent during these political discussions. Both sides are radical if you ask me.

Capler, I will say this once again and no more.
THE CRUCIAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CHRISTIANINTY AND ISLAM, LIES NOT WITH THE FOLLOWERS, BUT WITH THE ICONS.
In Mohammed's role as a military commander, he slew, enslaved and taxed thousands of people in converting them to Islam. This is a fact , it is in the Koran, and it is indsputable.
Jesus's actions in the bible (and elsewhere) has always showed him to be a man of peace, and one that let free will decide who would be converted and who wouldn't.
That's why the Crusades, the Klan, slavery, etc, may have been done in the name of Christianity, but CLEARLY not OF Christianity, as defined in teh Bible, and by Jesus's actions.
Now, knowing the the Koran teaches that infidels are to be enslaved, taxed, converted or killed, can you REALLY say that the recent Muslim terrorist attacks are in the same boat as Christians?

All the more reason to CLOSELY monitor Obama.  That was a helluva Freudian slip.  He didn't even correct himself, Stephanopoulos had to.

Enough said.

[Capler]

Thank goodness our founding fathers had  the good sense  to separate church and state.